Evaluative (summative and formative) vs. Assessment
Isaac and Michael (1995) describe an assessment as the determination of, "what is and what needs to be" (p. 11). An evaluation is a determination of the outcome or end result. In other words, an assessment tells a teacher what a student knows and/or needs to know. An evaluation tells a teacher what the student has learned.
With these definitions in place, a summative evaluation is what is defined as a evaluation. A formative evaluation is akin to an assessment.
“When you assess your individual students, you gather information about their level of performance or achievement. Evaluation is comparing a student's achievement with other students or with a set of standards.” (http://www.teachervision.fen.com/assessment/new-teacher/48353.html)
In a presentation by H. Stephen Straight (2002), two tables outline the the differences between assessment and evaluation along seven dimensions. ( assessment.binghamton.edu/documents/assessment_evaluation_straight.ppt) As is evident from the table, evaluation is the final determination about the learning that took place. Evaluation can be seen as the determination a teacher arrives at to assign grades at the end of the grading period. (http://specialed.about.com/od/assessment/a/AandE.htm)
Assessment, on the other hand, is feedback to the student about the learning process. It is a reflective activity to help a student determine what she/he knows or needs to work on. It is also a tool for the instructor to identify lesson modifications that may be indicated by the level and degree of learning students are evidencing. (http://specialed.about.com/od/assessment/a/AandE.htm)
Table 1
Difference between assessment and evaluation
Dimension of Difference
|
Assessment
|
Evaluation
|
Timing
|
Formative
|
Summative
|
Focus of Measurement
|
Process-Oriented
|
Product-Oriented
|
Relationship Between Administrator and Recipient
|
Reflective
|
Prescriptive
|
Findings, Uses Thereof
|
Diagnostic
|
Judgmental
|
Ongoing Modifiability of Criteria, Measures Thereof
|
Flexible
|
Fixed
|
Standards of Measurement
|
Absolute
|
Comparative
|
Relation Between Objects of A/E
|
Coöperative
|
Competitive
|
Table 2
Distinction between formative and summative evaluation
Formative
|
Summative
|
Ongoing: to Improve Learning
|
Final : to Gauge Quality
|
Process-Oriented: How Learning Is Going
|
Product-Oriented: What’s Been Learned
|
Reflective: Internally Defined Criteria/Goals
|
Prescriptive: Externally Imposed Standards
|
Diagnostic: Identify Areas for Improvement
|
Judgmental: Arrive at an Overall Grade/Score
|
Flexible: Adjust As Problems Are Clarified
|
Ongoing Modifiability of Criteria, Measures
|
As Table 2 outlines, formative and summative evaluation are quite different. As the name implies, formative evaluation is a cognitive activity that aims to clarify and guide learning. Summative evaluation is the final determination of learning.
What is confusing is the overlap of terminology as terminology evolved. Formative evaluation is really the definition of assessment. While summative evaluation is the definition of evaluation.
References
About. Assessement, evaluation and final marks. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from http://specialed.about.com/od/assessment/a/AandE.htm
Isaac, S. and Michael, W.B. (1995). Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
Straight, S.H. (2002). The difference between assessment and evaluaiton. Retrieved May 6, 2009 from assessment.binghamton.edu/documents/assessment_evaluation_straight.ppt
Teacher Vision. Assessment vs. evaluation. Retrieved May 6, 2009, from http://www.teachervision.fen.com/assessment/new-teacher/48353.html
Comments (6)
cchavez@csupomona.edu said
at 6:43 pm on May 7, 2009
I am trying to edit this page, but for the last 24 hours I cannot edit.
cchavez@csupomona.edu said
at 7:44 am on May 8, 2009
Finally got to edit page. Need to work on formatting this evening. Sorry for the delay.
cchavez@csupomona.edu said
at 9:53 am on May 8, 2009
OK, formatting and images are now right. I have to go back and edit the citations in APA style, as the rubric instructions mentioned links not citations, but the middle column mentions in-text and end of paragraph APA citations.
cchavez@csupomona.edu said
at 7:52 am on May 9, 2009
I edited the citations to reflect APA (I think I got it right) and worked on the formatting. But the display version is not the same as the edit version. Need to work on getting the article to display as it does in edit mode.
sguiles said
at 10:55 pm on May 10, 2009
Looks nice visually. (I know I'm the 3rd editor, but since I'm here, I thought I'd drop in and say hi and look it over).
I went to an APA site and they show indenting after the author line. Here's a document I found:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/18/
There's a colored box with a download of a pdf file that shows an APA formatted paper. Just thought you might be interested.
I may be very wrong.
Peace,
Steve
cchavez@csupomona.edu said
at 9:23 pm on May 11, 2009
Steve, I think you are right. In the reference section each first line of a reference is a hanging indent. But here I couldn't find a way to make a hanging indent. At least it was not apparent. I know how to do it using css, but not on this wiki. I will check it out when I get more time.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.