Problem Based Learning


 

Problem-based learning

 

Problem-based learning (PBL) is a model where students engage with complex and challenging problems. Then the students work collaboratively toward a resolution. PBL is about students connecting disciplinary knowledge to real-world problems. Further, the motivation to solve a problem becomes the motivation to learn. In PBL, the teacher acts as a facilitator and mentor, rather than a source of solutions. PBL provides the learner with opportunities to examine and try out what he/she knows. The learner discovers what they need to learn. The learner also improves her/his communications skills. Finally, the learner practices the skills that she needs after her education.

 

 


PBL History

 

The first application of PBL was in medical schools which rigorously test the knowledge base of graduates. Medical professionals need to keep up with new information in their field and the skill of life-long learning is particularly important for them. Hence, PBL was thought to be well suited for this area. Since then many medical and professional schools, as well as undergraduate and graduate programs use PBL in some form, at varying capacities internationally.

 

 


PBL Process

  

  

1. Explore the ideas,

2. List what you know,

3. List out all the possible solutions and the learning issues,

4. Write up your solution and developing documents, and revise your ideas if necessary,

5. Repeat and Recycle!

 

 


PBL Video 

 

 

 

 

References


Carver, L. (Producer). (2008). Problem based learning. [Web]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDe74bOxXLw

 

National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.  

 

Merrill, M.D. (2002). A pebble in the pond Model for Instructional Design. Performance Improvement 41 (7): 39-44. doi: 10. 1002/pfi.4140410709.

 

Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, j., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10: 251-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205.